Wednesday, November 15, 2006

BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Climate insurance urged for poor

Could you use insurance for this kind of crisis? It's nice in theory, and maybe for a few high-profile, feel-good early experiments. But once the insurers set their actuarial scientists to sit down and do some serious analysis, the premiums will go way up. (Although maybe still cheaper than

Also, aren't some of the disasters we're talking about, actually the kind of acts of God that insurers wouldn't touch?

6 comments:

Kaunda said...

You raise a good point about the "acts of God" aspect and how insurers might come to define "God."

This is a thought-provoking article and seems related to the subject of prediction markets you've brought up before.

I suspect that market-based solutions to risks associated with global climate change aren't going to sit too well with free-market thinking as it now stands.

Hedge-funds aren't regulated much now. Part of the trick to making money in them, it seems to me, is based on the lack of transparency.

One of the best parts of this insurance idea is that it could help to bring more transparency to market instruments for managing risks.

Rup3rt said...

Hi Phil!

There were a few papers, articles and ctiques on this at the micfrofinance gateway. Check the sitemap index or search under weather or rain.


These Malcolm Gladwell articles are good on shared risk - state versus corporate versus individual

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060828fa_fact

http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/050829fa_fact

Rup3rt said...

Unrelated but I am following this, looks great.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/podsandblogs/

Rup3rt said...

I am SrWeblink today

niemeyeroglyphics
http://bldgblog.blogspot.com/2006/11/utopian-typography.html

phil jones said...

Thanks Rup3rt, cool link

May have to have some of my site in it.

Kaunda said...

John Robb points to an interesting 7 page LA Times article in Robb's usual cut-to-the chase style titles it: "The End of Risk Pooling."

The article you point to suggests public-private partnerships. Like it or not I suspect that governments are going to become more involved as unfettered insurance markets become unpopular.